Recently, the focus has mainly been on the United States, Europe, Ukraine, and Russia, with news from China relatively quiet. However, in the past two days, there have been rumors circulating that the actual person in power in Beijing is no longer Xi Jinping. It’s been said that the truth will be revealed at the Fourth Plenary Session. Can the power struggle within the CCP be peacefully resolved through some form of internal compromise and negotiation? Who is truly in power in Beijing now?
Senior commentator and independent analyst Cai Shenkun mentioned on the NTD’s “Forum for Elites” program that at first, he didn’t plan to discuss this news. However, a close friend of his, who has a background working in the system and in high-level positions, shared information indicating that significant changes were happening in Beijing’s power structure. This friend had never discussed high-level CCP topics with him before.
The friend advised Cai Shenkun to stop focusing on Xi Jinping and emphasized that the current leader’s identity was becoming less relevant. This sparked Cai’s curiosity, given Xi’s influence over China’s population and international geopolitics. The friend provided insights suggesting that a shift in leadership was underway, especially pointing out developments concerning military figures like Zhang Yuxia.
Moreover, the friend mentioned that numerous high-ranking officials promoted in recent months were not aligned with Xi Jinping, indicating a shift in power dynamics within the party. Cai Shenkun, after careful consideration, noted that while there were some signs of Xi’s firm grip on power through anti-corruption measures and strict monitoring, the situation was complex and evolving.
The evolving power dynamics within the CCP, particularly the changes in the military, have raised concerns about Xi Jinping’s standing. The internal shifts, especially regarding the 31st Army and its key figures being replaced, indicated a significant development that could impact Xi’s control. Observers are keenly watching for clues leading up to the Fourth Plenary Session to gauge the future leadership lineup.
Independent television producer Li Jun expressed skepticism about the internal revelations, cautioning against premature conclusions based on past instances where anticipated leadership changes did not materialize. Li emphasized the root problem being the CCP system itself, and only through its dissolution could China return to normalcy.
Another media figure, Guo Jun, highlighted the inherent dangers and bloodshed resulting from power struggles within authoritarian regimes. He doubted the CCP’s ability to find a peaceful compromise due to the deep-seated animosities and loyalty within various factions, especially those who may seek retribution once in power.
The intricate balance of power and authority requires a delicate touch, and any abrupt changes in leadership could provoke potential internal conflicts. For stability to be maintained, the dictator must exercise restraint. However, if the dynamics shift, the consequences could be dire and tumultuous within the party ranks.
As uncertainties loom over Xi’s future, the internal discontent within the CCP remains widespread, with mounting pressure challenging his authority. The possibility of a negotiated settlement appears slim within the party’s rigid political framework, setting the stage for potentially abrupt and even violent confrontations.
The “Forum for Elites” program produced by NTD and Epoch Times serves as a platform for high-level discussions, offering in-depth analyses on pressing issues and historical truths for the audience’s enlightenment.
This report provides a glimpse into the complex power struggles and uncertainties within the CCP, signaling a potential shift in leadership dynamics that could have far-reaching implications for China’s political landscape. The ongoing developments underscore the ever-present fragility and fluidity of power within authoritarian regimes.